NUJ members at FT vote decisively for industrial action over pay and collective bargaining

postcreative

Journalists at the Financial Times has voted decisively to ballot for industrial action, rejecting a pay offer of 2 per cent and opposing a threat to collective pay negotiation.

The mood among the 150 journalists who met last week was determined; they believe that the management is out of touch with the workforce and that the below-inflation pay deal is unacceptable – especially as Pearson remains well in profit. The management’s proposal to keep back nearly half of a potential award of 3.5 per cent to hand out to select individuals has been seen as deeply divisive and an attack on union collective bargaining, as set out in the FT House Agreement.

NUJ general secretary Michelle Stanistreet said: “Last week’s meeting and vote for industrial action is an indication of the real anger among the FT’s journalists about the deal the management has put on the table.”

Union rep Steve Bird said: “A low pay offer is bad enough, but plundering the pay fund to retain staff or reward select individuals has added insult to injury. The majority should not be forced to subsidise opaque bonus payments with yet another real terms pay cut. Industrial action is not something to be taken lightly, but the chapel is united over this.”

The NUJ chapel is open to any offer of further talks with FT management.

National organiser Fiona Swarbrick said: “We’re keen to resolve this dispute, but management must demonstrate that they understand the financial pressures our members are under at the current time. They must channel more of the pay fund into alleviating the impact of high inflation on their staff. We are not at all surprised that the FT chapel has become so frustrated. Pay rises in recent years have reflected neither the cost of living nor Pearson’s increasing profitability.”


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar

postcreative