The NUJ has expressed concern at the increase in intimidation and bullying of journalists covering the independence referendum and calls for people on both sides of the campaign to reign in the abuse being directed at our members.

Scottish independent referendum

For the duration of the referendum, the union says there has been hostility to its members doing their jobs, with much of the abuse on social media, allowing contributors anonymity to make personal attacks on individuals.

NUJ Scottish organiser Paul Holleran said: “People have the right to protest if they believe strongly about an issue, however protesters outside the BBC offices in Glasgow this weekend have demanded that journalists be sacked, for allegedly being biased in favour of the union.

“Journalists in Edinburgh and Aberdeen were abused over the weekend when simply turning up to report on events organised by both sides. Others were on the receiving end of a range of abuse and intolerance on social media, some of which has been logged and maybe reported to the police.

“We have also experienced a number of Labour MPs, accusing the corporation’s most experienced and talented journalists of political bias against the Better Together campaign. This highlights the fact that people on both sides are accusing the BBC of bias.

“Robust debate is fine. Pointing out when journalists get their facts wrong is expected and welcomed. But NUJ members believe in a free press, a fair media, with journalists allowed to do their jobs free of intimidation. We hope the politicians and campaigners, and those who follow politics take this on board and act with a bit of maturity and understanding of the role of journalists in holding those in power to account.

“What is totally unacceptable is the use of threats of violence. The NUJ has history of acting on this type of behaviour and Police Scotland has been supportive and has intervened when we have previously pursued such action.”

The NUJ says it will not accept this treatment of its members and has already advised a number of journalists in making legal complaints to the police. It also says it will name and shame individuals and organisations that continue to threaten or bully journalists.

More widely, the NUJ asks the leadership on both sides to consider carefully the implications of their attacks on journalists for asking challenging questions. If that is to be interpreted as bias, and therefore the journalist is deemed to be open to personal criticism and abuse, then the nature of public debate will be debased, and we will all suffer.

The NUJ is also challenging news organisations, and editors, to question their own values when they give column inches or airtime to attacks on journalists from rival organisations. Journalists need to ask where that leaves our role, collectively, in holding those in power to account.

There are massive political decisions ahead for Scotland and the independence referendum campaign is coming to a frenzied close. The NUJ believes there will and should be increased opportunities across the media for robust exchanges, challenging all participants in the debate but carried out in a civilised manner.

The union believes it is essential that respect is shown to participants if journalists are to maximise the number of people willing to take part in those debates. They also need to respect the role of journalists in fairly moderating those debates, and refrain from intimidation and personal abuse.

In particular, the NUJ is concerned about threats about future employment at the country’s main broadcaster as well as public labelling of journalists and programmes as being biased. As the Public Service Broadcaster, BBC Scotland’s journalism is rightly scrutinised very closely by people and parties on all sides of the political debate. No journalist working for the organisation has a problem with this but they have been singled out by demonstrations which by and large have been loud and rowdy but can be perceived as being intimidatory and a threat to press freedom. There is an increasing trend towards the intimidation of BBC journalists, who are working hard to hold politicians of all sides to account in the referendum debate.

Tweet from journalist Andrew Browne


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar

Tim Lezard

Campaigning journalist, editor of @Union_NewsUK, NUJ exec member; lover of cricket, football, cycling, theatre and dodgy punk bands

Read All Articles

Related Articles

#Conegate: anatomy of a campaign
Fri Jan 2014 /

#Conegate: anatomy of a campaign

The Case of the Conegate in Glasgow may seem like a frivolous example for trade union activists involved in serious campaigns, but it has important lessons in effectively getting your message across and making change happen.

Read More