UNISON calls for social work training to include modules about presenting in court and writing court reports

Tim Lezard Europe, UK, Public (PSI), Unison,

social worker

Half the social workers questioned admitted they were not confident when appearing before a judge.

The report – Social Work, the Courts and the Consequences of Transparency – compiled a year after new guidance about open family courts was issued by the government, also shows that 80% of social workers would consider leaving the profession if they thought they would suffer as a result of being named in court.

One social worker, who had received no training on giving evidence, described being cross-examined in a High Court hearing as: “An awful experience. I felt that I was a lamb to the slaughter.”

Another said her appearance at a tribunal ten years earlier: “Still makes me shudder with fear when I think back.”

Official figures show a 50% rise in the number of social workers leaving the profession in the last two years. While this is not solely down to stressful court work, UNISON is warning that publicly naming those involved in contentious cases could force more to quit.

Surprisingly, 70% of the 1,080 social workers surveyed said they were not aware their name might be made public when court judgements were made; 57% said no steps were taken by their employers to protect them in these circumstances.

The report also highlights a gap in social work training with one third of respondents saying it did not prepare them properly for writing court reports or presenting to a judge. The situation is even worse for newly qualified social workers where just one in ten surveyed said they had been well-trained.

UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis said: “Social workers play a huge part in the legal process, advising on life-changing decisions for vulnerable individuals and families. They should have all the support and training possible to give them the confidence to face what can sometimes be a traumatic experience.

“If social workers feel under pressure and are worried about being publicly pilloried they will not be able to perform to the best of their ability and their clients are likely to suffer. This is an issue that is obviously having a major impact and needs to be addressed before we lose more social workers – something the UK can ill afford.

“It is unacceptable that social workers are having to carry the can in court for decisions which their supervisors have overseen.

“We are calling on all employers to agree to protect social workers from what is potentially a very damaging situation. Local authorities must also exercise their duty of care with better handling of any media attention and providing staff with appropriate legal support.”

UNISON is calling for social work training to include modules about presenting in court and writing court reports, and for local councils to protect social workers who are named in court or put in requests to prevent them from being named in the first place.

Guidance to protect social workers from the potentially harmful effects of being named in court judgments has been produced by UNISON.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar

Tim Lezard

Campaigning journalist, editor of @Union_NewsUK, NUJ exec member; lover of cricket, football, cycling, theatre and dodgy punk bands

Read All Articles