Unions outline opposition to market testing and privatisation, saying private companies cost jobs, pay and conditions


Ministers are today being urged by unions to give public sector in-house bids equal consideration as firms gather in London to hear about the next round of possible privatisations.

Union representatives will outline their opposition to market testing and privatisation of prisons outside a meeting that will be attended by contractors in London.

PCS rep, with the probation officers’ union NAPO and Prison Officers Association, will highlight the fact that private companies cut costs by cutting jobs, pay and conditions for staff – as shown by the recent decision to hand Birmingham prison over to G4S.

But because the government believes a straight comparison between in-house public sector bids and ones from the private sector would be ‘unfair’ to the private sector, notional costs are added to in-house bids to create a so called ‘level playing field’.

Following the process that led to the handover of Birmingham in October – the first prison to transfer from the public to private sector – the government is now running market testing for a further nine prisons: Acklington, Castington, Coldingley, Durham, Hatfield, Lindholme, Moorland, Onley and the Wolds (currently run by G4S). Decisions are scheduled for October 2012.

The unions are leafleting outside a meeting hosted by the Ministry of Justice at Somerset House, London, to launch this second phase of its privatisation programme.

PCS general secretary Mark Serwotka said: “We believe it is morally indefensible to seek to make a profit from locking people up and rehabilitating them, and are opposed to any further privatisation.

“But the government appears to be ideologically committed to selling off more essential public services like this, and tilting the balance in favour of privatisation.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar