The Commercial, Stevedoring, Agricultural & Allied Workers Union (CSAAWU) has approached the Constitutional Court to overturn decisions by the Labour Court ordering the union to pay legal fees amounting to £30,000.

CSAAWU represented farm workers in the Western Cape agricultural strikes in 2012/13. Most of these strikes for increased wages were unprotected and many workers lost their jobs.

The union fought and lost two dismissal cases in 2014 in the Labour Court, one against Steytler Boerdery and a second against La Maison. The court ruled that the union must pay the legal fees of La Maison and Steytler Boerdery farms, on the grounds that CSAAWU and the workers displayed “intransigent” and reckless attitudes in participating in an unprotected strike.

CSAAWU applied to the Constitutional Court for leave to appeal against the costs orders on 19 June.

The Socio-Economic Rights Institute (SERI), which now acts for CSAAWU, says the substance of the Labour Court judgments is not in dispute. But CSAAWU says neither the union nor the workers can afford to pay the fees and the judgment will discourage access to the courts by workers.

Despite fundraising efforts such as “Keep CSAAWU Doors Open” raising £7,500, the union faces bankruptcy.

Deputy General Secretary Karel Swart said CSAAWU wanted to achieve justice for the “poorest and vulnerable workers” and appealed to “the Constitutional Court to set aside this devastating cost ordered against a small union.”

He said the Court judgment was “a serious attack on the existence of farm workers’ organisations like CSAAWU.”

According to the 2011 study Farmworkers’ Dismal, Dangerous Lives by Human Rights Watch (HRW), only 3% of farmworkers are represented by a trade union in the Western Cape.

“We are trying to keep CSAAWU alive,” said SERI attorney Bhavna Ramji.

CSAAWU is an unaffiliated union deriving funds chiefly from membership fees of 50p a week. Members are not able to pay the fees regularly.

“The simple fact is that if the costs orders stand and the two farmers in whose favour they were made choose to execute them (one, Steytler Boerdery, has already taken steps to attach CSAAWU’s office property, finding goods worth just over £150), CSAAWU will close down,” Ramji said.

We asked for comment from the farmers via their attorneys but had not yet received a response at the time of publication.

CSAAWU’s case was based on the labour law principle that states the court must consider fairness when deciding whether to order the losing side to pay legal fees.

“Fairness looks at the financial situation of the losing side, the importance of maintaining good and equal labour relations between employee and employer, and the good faith of a party in bringing litigation (amongst other things). If CSAAWU loses, then this will be the third [time a] court in post-Apartheid, constitutional South Africa which has let them down. It would indicate that the farmworkers in the Western Cape, who produce the wine, fruit and meat that we eat and drink, stand alone in their pursuit of equal treatment and fair labour practices,” Ramji said.

CSAAWU supported the Joostenberg family who recently won a case against their eviction off the farm in Montagu that they had been living on for decades.

Originally published by GroundUp

 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar

Mariska Morris

Related Articles