Union says full-scale reform of civil service pay and implementation of genuine pay increases is long overdue


Prospect has described the Coalition government’s decision to restrict bonuses in the public sector as a pointless measure which shows up the inadequacy of civil service pay arrangements.

Prospect deputy general secretary Dai Hudd said: “This is an arbitrary announcement, which has been made without consulting the unions.

“Our members did not ask for bonuses, which in most cases are a substitute for a pay award. They want to be paid the proper rate for the job that they do”

The union says bonuses were introduced by the Treasury in the 1990s as part of a government policy designed to make departments more ‘business-like’.

The comments follow a report that Treasury Secretary Danny Alexander wants to ensure there is “no reward for failure” in public services.

Organisations such as Channel Four, Royal Mail and the Met Office are expected to be included in the review.

Daid Hudd said: “It’s all very well for Danny Alexander to complain about them now, but it’s the politicians and Treasury officials who drove forward this agenda, introducing arrangements that in many cases replaced genuine pay increases.

“For members of Prospect, who are middle managers, professionals and specialists, most of the sums involved represent hundreds of pounds a year, not thousands. It’s ludicrous to compare these amounts with the vast bonuses that bankers and other top managers receive.

“That debate should not be used as a smokescreen to whittle away even more at civil service pay, at a time when members already face pay freezes and pension increases. All it shows is that a full-scale reform of civil service pay arrangements is long overdue.”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
Author avatar